The George Institute For Global Health
Global
United Kingdom
India
China
Australia

A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Employed in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) Clinical Research.

TitleA Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Employed in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) Clinical Research.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsAndersen, CR, Fitzgerald, E, Delaney, A, Finfer, S
JournalNeurocrit Care
Date Published06/2018
ISSN1556-0961
Abstract

<p>Consensus on appropriate outcome measures to use in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) research has not been established, although the transition toward a core outcome set (COS) would provide significant benefits. To inform COS development, we conducted a systematic review to identify outcome measures included in reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions in patients with aSAH. Ovid Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched. RCTs investigating aSAH published between January 1996 and May 2015 were included. The primary and secondary outcomes of RCTs were recorded and classified according to the OMERACT Consortium's framework. We identified 1093 potential studies of which 129 met inclusion criteria representing 24 238 patients. There were 285 unique outcome measures. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was the most frequently used primary outcome (13/129, 10.1%). Mortality was reported in 84 trials (65.1%) with 3 months the most common time point (34/129, 26.4%). The GOS (65/129, 50.4%) and the Modified Rankin Scale (51/129, 39.5%) were the most commonly reported functional measures; however, these were reported at different time points and often dichotomized using different ranges. Patient-reported quality of life measures were used in 11 trials (8.5%). Transcranial Doppler was the most frequently used imaging modality (40/129, 31.0%). Definitions and reporting of vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia and imaging modality results were highly variable. The marked heterogeneity of outcomes in reports of RCTs supports the development of a core outcome set for aSAH trials. Our study has identified a wide range of outcomes for potential inclusion in a future aSAH COS.</p>

DOI10.1007/s12028-018-0566-0
Alternate JournalNeurocrit Care
PubMed ID29951958
English